Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7874
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchumacher, Petra-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-06T07:29:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-06T07:29:58Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7889-
dc.description.abstractPropositional content is often incomplete but comprehenders appear to adjust meaning and add unarticulated meaning constituents effortlessly. This happens at the propositional level (The baby drank the bottle) but also at the phrasal level (the wooden turtle). In two ERP experiments, combinatorial processing was investigated in container/content alternations and adjective-noun combination transforming an animate entity into a physical object. Experiment 1 revealed that container-for-content alternations (The baby drank the bottle) engendered a Late Positivity on the critical expression and on the subsequent segment, while content-for-container alternations (Chris put the beer on the table) did not exert extra costs. In Experiment 2, adjective-noun combinations (the wooden turtle) also evoked a Late Positivity on the critical noun. First, the Late Positivities are taken to reflect discourse updating demands resulting from reference shift from the original denotation to the contextually appropriate interpretation (e.g., the reconceptualization form animal to physical object). This shift is supported by the linguistic unavailability of the original meaning, exemplified by copredication tests. Second, the data reveal that meaning alternations differ qualitatively. Some alternations involve (cost-free) meaning selection, while others engender processing demands associated with reconceptualization. This dissociation thus calls for a new typology of metonymic shifts that centers around the status of the involved discourse referents.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizinde
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/*
dc.subject.ddc400 Sprachede_DE
dc.subject.ddc400 Languageen_GB
dc.titleWhen combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization : toward a new approach of compositionalityen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7874-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 05 Philosophie und Philologiede
jgu.organisation.number7920-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleFrontiers in psychologyde
jgu.journal.volume4de
jgu.pages.alternativeArt. 677de
jgu.publisher.year2013-
jgu.publisher.nameFrontiers Research Foundationde
jgu.publisher.placeLausannede
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00677de
jgu.publisher.issn1664-1078de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode400de
opus.date.modified2018-08-02T09:31:43Z-
opus.subject.dfgcode01-104-
opus.organisation.stringFB 05: Philosophie und Philologie: Department of English and Linguisticsde_DE
opus.identifier.opusid24180-
opus.institute.number0501-
opus.metadataonlyfalse-
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_EN
opus.affiliatedSchumacher, Petra-
jgu.publisher.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00677de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017)

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
when_combinatorial_processing-20220915065602891.pdf918.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open