Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7741
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeiland, Hanna-
dc.contributor.authorBambini, Valentina-
dc.contributor.authorSchumacher, Petra-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T07:34:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T07:34:25Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7756-
dc.description.abstractThe role of literal meaning during the construction of meaning that goes beyond pure literal composition was investigated by combining cross-modal masked priming and ERPs. This experimental design was chosen to compare two conflicting theoretical positions on this topic. The indirect access account claims that literal aspects are processed first, and additional meaning components are computed only if no satisfactory interpretation is reached. In contrast, the direct access approach argues that figurative aspects can be accessed immediately. We presented metaphors (These lawyers are hyenas, Experiment 1a and 1b) and producer-for-product metonymies (The boy read Böll, Experiment 2a and 2b) with and without a prime word that was semantically relevant to the literal meaning of the target word (furry and talented, respectively). In the presentation without priming, metaphors revealed a biphasic N400-Late Positivity pattern, while metonymies showed an N400 only. We interpret the findings within a two-phase language architecture where contextual expectations guide initial access (N400) and precede pragmatic adjustment resulting in reconceptualization (Late Positivity). With masked priming, the N400-difference was reduced for metaphors and vanished for metonymies. This speaks against the direct access view that predicts a facilitating effect for the literal condition only and hence would predict the N400-difference to increase. The results are more consistent with indirect access accounts that argue for facilitation effects for both conditions and consequently for consistent or even smaller N400-amplitude differences. This combined masked priming ERP paradigm therefore yields new insights into the role of literal meaning in the online composition of figurative language.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizinde
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/*
dc.subject.ddc400 Sprachede_DE
dc.subject.ddc400 Languageen_GB
dc.titleThe role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension : evidence from masked priming ERPen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7741-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 05 Philosophie und Philologiede
jgu.organisation.number7920-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleFrontiers in human neurosciencede
jgu.journal.volume8de
jgu.pages.alternativeArt. 583de
jgu.publisher.year2014-
jgu.publisher.nameFrontiers Research Foundationde
jgu.publisher.placeLausannede
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00583de
jgu.publisher.issn1662-5161de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode400de
opus.date.modified2018-08-08T08:04:21Z-
opus.subject.dfgcode00-000-
opus.organisation.stringFB 05: Philosophie und Philologie: Department of English and Linguisticsde_DE
opus.identifier.opusid26871-
opus.institute.number0501-
opus.metadataonlyfalse-
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_EN
opus.affiliatedWeiland, Hanna-
opus.affiliatedSchumacher, Petra-
jgu.publisher.doi10.3389/fnhum.2014.00583de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017)

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
the_role_of_literal_meaning_i-20220913184735684.pdf1.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open