Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7342
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPersike, Malte-
dc.contributor.authorMeinhardt, Günter-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-11T09:49:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-11T09:49:27Z-
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7356-
dc.description.abstractWe examined the effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on human contour integration under various conditions of uncertainty. Participants performed a temporal 2AFC contour detection task. Spatial frequency jitter up to 3.0 octaves was applied either to background elements, or to contour and background elements, or to none of both. Results converge on four major findings. (1) Contours defined by spatial frequency similarity alone are only scarcely visible, suggesting the absence of specialized cortical routines for shape detection based on spatial frequency similarity. (2) When orientation collinearity and spatial frequency similarity are combined along a contour, performance amplifies far beyond probability summation when compared to the fully heterogenous condition but only to a margin compatible with probability summation when compared to the fully homogenous case. (3) Psychometric functions are steeper but not shifted for homogenous contours in heterogenous backgrounds indicating an advantageous signal-to-noise ratio. The additional similarity cue therefore not so much improves contour detection performance but primarily reduces observer uncertainty about whether a potential candidate is a contour or just a false positive. (4) Contour integration is a broadband mechanism which is only moderately impaired by spatial frequency dissimilarity.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizinde
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleEffects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on contour integrationen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7342-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titlePLoS onede
jgu.journal.volume10de
jgu.journal.issue6de
jgu.pages.alternativee0126449de
jgu.publisher.year2015-
jgu.publisher.namePLoSde
jgu.publisher.placeLawrence, Kan.de
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126449de
jgu.publisher.issn1932-6203de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode150de
opus.date.modified2018-09-05T09:11:48Z
opus.subject.dfgcode00-000
opus.organisation.stringFB 02: Sozialwissenschaften, Medien und Sport: Psychologisches Institutde_DE
opus.identifier.opusid51965
opus.institute.number0204
opus.metadataonlyfalse
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_EN
opus.affiliatedPersike, Malte
opus.affiliatedMeinhardt, Günter
jgu.publisher.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0126449de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017)

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
effects_of_spatial_frequency_-20220710203919706.pdf2.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open