Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7321Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Greenfield, Julia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Appelmann, Philipp | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lafon, Yoann | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bruyère-Garnier, Karine | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Rommens, Pol Maria | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuhn, Sebastian | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-06T10:17:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-06T10:17:12Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7335 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The Distal Tibia Nail (DTN; Mizuho, Japan) has demonstrated higher biomechanical stiffness to locking plates in previous research for A3 distal tibia fractures. It is here investigated as a fixation option for supramalleolar corrective osteotomies (SMOT). Sixteen Sawbones tibiae were implanted with either a DTN (n = 8) or Medial Distal Tibia Plate (MDTP; n = 8) and a SMOT simulated. Two surgical outcome scenarios were envisaged: “best-case” representing an intact lateral cortex, and “worst-case” representing a fractured lateral cortex. All samples were subjected to compressive (350 N, 700 N) and torsional (± 4 Nm, ± 8 Nm) testing. Samples were evaluated using calculated construct stiffness from force–displacement data, interfragmentary movement and Von Mises’ strain distribution. The DTN demonstrated a greater compressive stiffness for the best-case surgical scenario, whereas the MDTP showed higher stiffness (p < 0.05) for the worst-case surgical scenario. In torsional testing, the DTN proved more resistant to torsion in the worst-case surgical setup (p < 0.05) for both ± 4 Nm and ± 8 Nm. The equivalent stiffness of the DTN against the MDTP supports the use of this implant for SMOT fixation and should be considered as a treatment option particularly in patients presenting vascularisation problems where the MDTP is an inappropriate choice. | en_GB |
| dc.language.iso | eng | de |
| dc.rights | CC BY | * |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medizin | de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medical sciences | en_GB |
| dc.title | A comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies | en_GB |
| dc.type | Zeitschriftenaufsatz | de |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7321 | - |
| jgu.type.dinitype | article | en_GB |
| jgu.type.version | Published version | de |
| jgu.type.resource | Text | de |
| jgu.organisation.department | FB 04 Medizin | de |
| jgu.organisation.number | 2700 | - |
| jgu.organisation.name | Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz | - |
| jgu.rights.accessrights | openAccess | - |
| jgu.journal.title | Scientific reports | de |
| jgu.journal.volume | 11 | de |
| jgu.pages.alternative | 18834 | de |
| jgu.publisher.year | 2021 | - |
| jgu.publisher.name | Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature | de |
| jgu.publisher.place | London | de |
| jgu.publisher.issn | 2045-2322 | de |
| jgu.organisation.place | Mainz | - |
| jgu.subject.ddccode | 610 | de |
| jgu.publisher.doi | 10.1038/s41598-021-97968-z | de |
| jgu.organisation.ror | https://ror.org/023b0x485 | - |
| Appears in collections: | JGU-Publikationen | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | a_comparative_biomechanical_s-20220706121351860.pdf | 1.65 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |