Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7037
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaumgart, Marlene-
dc.contributor.authorRiemer, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-25T09:21:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-25T09:21:49Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7051-
dc.description.abstractThis study provides a process-based perspective on the amplification of forecast uncertainty and forecast errors in ensemble forecasts. A case from the North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment that exhibits large forecast uncertainty is analysed. Two aspects of the ensemble behaviour are considered: (a) the mean divergence of the ensemble members, indicating the general amplification of forecast uncertainty, and (b) the divergence of the best and worst members, indicating extremes in possible error-growth scenarios. To analyse the amplification of forecast uncertainty, a tendency equation for the ensemble variance of potential vorticity (PV) is derived and partitioned into the contributions from individual processes. The amplification of PV variance is, on average for the midlatitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, dominated by near-tropopause dynamics. Locally, however, other processes can dominate the variance amplification, for example, in the region where tropical storm Karl interacts with the Rossby-wave pattern during extratropical transition. In this region, the variance amplification is dominated by upper-tropospheric divergence and tropospheric–deep interaction and is thereby mostly related to (moist baroclinic) cyclone development. The differences between the error growth in the best and worst ensemble members can, to a large part, be attributed to differences in the representation of cut-off evolution around 3 days, which subsequently amplifies substantially in the highly nonlinear region of the Rossby-wave pattern until 5 days. In terms of the processes, the differences in error growth are dominated by differences in the error growth by near-tropopause dynamics. The approach presented provides flow-dependent insight into the dynamics of forecast uncertainty and forecast errors and helps to understand better the different contributions of specific weather systems to the medium-range amplification of ensemble spread.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc530 Physikde_DE
dc.subject.ddc530 Physicsen_GB
dc.titleProcesses governing the amplification of ensemble spread in a medium-range forecast with large forecast uncertaintyen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7037-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 08 Physik, Mathematik u. Informatikde
jgu.organisation.number7940-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Societyde
jgu.journal.volume145de
jgu.journal.issue724de
jgu.pages.start3252de
jgu.pages.end3270de
jgu.publisher.year2019-
jgu.publisher.nameWileyde
jgu.publisher.placeWeinheimde
jgu.publisher.issn1477-870Xde
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode530de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1002/qj.3617de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
processes_governing_the_ampli-20220525102510852.pdf9.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open