Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6411
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrenken, Marius-
dc.contributor.authorImhoff, Roland-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-26T07:21:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-26T07:21:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/6421-
dc.description.abstractConspiracy theories arise for virtually any public event (e.g., pandemics, assassinations, disasters). In light of positively correlated endorsements of such beliefs, many have pointed to a more general mindset behind this. Others have argued against this notion of a consistent mindset. Applying Latent Profile Analyses, we examine the evidence for either uniform or differentiated response patterns to various items in five studies (reanalyzed datasets, total N = 7877). Overall, the results speak strongly to uniform reactions that could be summarized as a general mindset, but also revealed important qualifications. First, small parts of the samples show more differentiated patterns in relation to extraterrestrial cover-up narratives (Studies 2 to 4) or contradictory theories (Study 5). Second, indicators dealing with the general suppression of relevant information in the public were among the items with the highest approval ratings across all classes. One discussed implication is that existing scales are useful tools to measure conspiracy mindsets. Another implication is that the average endorsement of any conspiracy theory is a function of both the respondents’ conspiracy mindset and the item’s psychometric difficulty, strongly suggesting interpreting item endorsement only in relative terms, but refraining from interpreting a high agreement as an absolute number.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleA uniform conspiracy mindset or differentiated reactions to specific conspiracy beliefs? : Evidence from latent profile analysesen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6411-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleInternational review of social psychologyde
jgu.journal.volume34de
jgu.journal.issue1de
jgu.pages.alternative27de
jgu.publisher.year2021-
jgu.publisher.nameUbiquity Pressde
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.590de
jgu.publisher.issn2397-8570de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode150de
jgu.publisher.doi10.5334/irsp.590
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
frenken_marius-a_uniform_cons-20211021120911051.pdfPaper1.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Thumbnail
frenken_marius-a_uniform_cons-20211021120911374.pdfAppendix98.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open