Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6300
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmiri, Marjan-
dc.contributor.authorMurgas, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorStang, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorMichel, Martin C.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-24T09:11:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-24T09:11:20Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/6310-
dc.description.abstractAIMS To explore the use of means vs medians (assuming or not the presence of normal distribution) in studies reporting overactive bladder syndrome symptoms and to test for normal distribution of basal values and treatment-associated changes thereof in two large noninterventional studies. METHODS Systematic review of all original studies reporting on at least one overactive bladder syndrome symptom published in four leading urology journals in 2016 to 2017. Testing of the normal distribution of urgency, incontinence, frequency, and nocturia in two large noninterventional studies (n = 1335 and 745). RESULTS Among 48 eligible articles, 86% reported means (assuming a normal distribution), 6% medians (not making this assumption), and 8% a combination thereof. Baseline values for all four symptoms and treatment-associated alterations thereof deviated from a normal distribution (P < .0001 in all cases). Means overestimated basal value and absolute changes thereof as compared with medians, for example, basal number of incontinence episodes in study 1 5.1 vs 4. Differences between means and medians for percentage changes of symptoms were small and did not consistently favor means over medians. CONCLUSIONS Dominant reporting of means implies the assumption of a normal distribution of overactive bladder syndrome symptoms but our data from two noninterventional studies do not support this assumption. We recommend that basal values and absolute symptom changes should be reported as medians and subjected to nonparametric analysis; means may be appropriate for the reporting of percentage changes of symptoms.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY-NC*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleDo overactive bladder symptoms and their treatment-associated changes exhibit a normal distribution? Implications for analysis and reportingen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6300-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleNeurourology and urodynamicsde
jgu.journal.volume39de
jgu.journal.issue2de
jgu.pages.start754de
jgu.pages.end761de
jgu.publisher.year2020-
jgu.publisher.nameWiley-Lissde
jgu.publisher.placeChichester u.a.de
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24275de
jgu.publisher.issn1520-6777de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1002/nau.24275
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
amiri_marjan-do_overactive_-20210824095701663.pdf571.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open