1. Startpage
  2. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
  3. JGU-Publikationen
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5749
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDotzauer, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorLa Torre, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Anita-
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Maximillian P.-
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, Katharina-
dc.contributor.authorMager, René-
dc.contributor.authorBorgmann, Hendrik-
dc.contributor.authorJäger, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorKurosch, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorHöfner, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorRuckes, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorHaferkamp, Axel-
dc.contributor.authorTsaur, Igor-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-10T09:24:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-10T09:24:23Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/5758-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE Open simple prostatectomy (OSP) is a standard surgical technique for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate size larger than 80 ml. As a minimally invasive approach, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) emerged as a feasible surgical alternative. Currently, there are no definite recommendations for the standard use of RASP. Therefore, we aimed at investigating various clinical outcomes comparing RASP with OSP. METHODS In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated clinical data from 103 RASP and 31 OSP patients. Both cohorts were compared regarding different clinical characteristics with and without propensity score matching. To detect independent predictive factors for clinical outcomes, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy patients demonstrated a lower estimated blood loss and need for postoperative blood transfusions as well as less postoperative complications. OSP had a shorter operative time (125 min vs. 182 min) longer hospital stay (11 days vs. 9 days) and longer time to catheter removal (8 days vs. 6 days). In the multivariate analysis, RASP was identified as an independent predictor for longer operative time, lower estimated blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay, shorter time to catheter removal, less postoperative complications and blood transfusions. CONCLUSION Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a safe alternative to OSP with less perioperative and postoperative morbidity. Whether OSP (shorter operative time) or RASP (shorter length of hospital stay) has a more favorable economic impact depends on the particular conditions of different health care systems. Further prospective comparative research is warranted to define the value of RASP in the current surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleRobot-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy : a single-center comparisonen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5749-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleWorld journal of urologyde
jgu.journal.volume39de
jgu.pages.start149de
jgu.pages.end156de
jgu.publisher.year2021-
jgu.publisher.nameSpringerde
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin u.a.de
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03168-1de
jgu.publisher.issn1433-8726de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s00345-020-03168-1-
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
dotzauer_robert-robot-assisted-20210416122433095.pdf584.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record