Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-233
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBräscher, Anne-Kathrin-
dc.contributor.authorWitthöft, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-21T10:29:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-21T11:29:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/235-
dc.description.abstractThis article contains intensity and aversiveness ratings of electrical stimuli and data on electrodermal activity (skin conductance level and skin conductance response) during an implicit conditioning procedure. Further, answers from a questionnaire on contingency awareness are provided. The experiment consisted of three phases. In the acquisition, two types of visual stimuli (CS+ and CS-) were coupled to weakly and moderately painful electrical stimuli presented to the participants’ (N = 48) dominant hand. In the test phase, after both CS+ and CS- only the weakly painful electrical stimuli were presented. In the contingency test phase, no more electrical stimuli were presented and participants had the task to rate intensity and aversiveness as if an electrical stimulus had been presented. This phase served as a test for first-order contingency awareness. Afterwards participants filled in a questionnaire with five questions to assess their level of second-order contingency awareness. For more insight, please see Nocebo hyperalgesia induced by implicit conditioning (Bräscher and Witthöft, 2019).en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizin-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rightsCC BYde_DE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleBehavioral and electrodermal data on implicit nocebo conditioning using supraliminally presented visual stimulien_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde_DE
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:hebis:77-publ-594252-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-233-
jgu.type.dinitypearticle-
jgu.type.versionPublished versionen_GB
jgu.type.resourceText-
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sport-
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleData in Brief-
jgu.journal.volume27-
jgu.pages.alternativeArt. 104705-
jgu.publisher.year2019-
jgu.publisher.nameElsevier-
jgu.publisher.placeAmsterdam-
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104705-
jgu.publisher.issn2352-3409-
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode150-
opus.date.accessioned2019-11-21T10:29:54Z-
opus.date.modified2019-11-21T11:04:38Z-
opus.date.available2019-11-21T11:29:54-
opus.subject.dfgcode00-000-
opus.organisation.stringFB 02: Sozialwissenschaften, Medien und Sport: Psychologisches Institutde_DE
opus.identifier.opusid59425-
opus.institute.number0204-
opus.metadataonlyfalse-
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_GB
opus.affiliatedBräscher, Anne-Kathrin-
opus.affiliatedWitthöft, Michael-
jgu.publisher.doi10.1016/j.dib.2019.104705
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
59425.pdf208.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open