Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9971
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchmalbach, Ileana-
dc.contributor.authorBastianon, Christina Diane-
dc.contributor.authorAfifi, Walid A.-
dc.contributor.authorFranke, Gabriele Helga-
dc.contributor.authorHinz, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorPetrowski, Katja-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T08:47:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-26T08:47:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9989-
dc.description.abstractBackground The experience of uncertainty is ubiquitous and universal across the globe. Many available tools measuring uncertainty are focused on one aspect of uncertainty, e.g., patients with life-threatening illnesses, hence a measure considering (chronic) uncertainty as an integral experience reflect ongoing uncertainties from a socio cultural perspective is missing. Additionally, current tools do not account for an extended timeframe to measure chronic forms of uncertainty. The objective of this study is to validate a translated German version of the 20 item Chronic Uncertainty Scale (CU-20). Methods The full sample comprised N=462 participants. Most of the participants were young German citizens and the sex distribution was relatively balanced (60% females; age in average: M=24.56; SD=4.78). Using equally split samples, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) evaluated the CU-20 factor structure, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the established factor structure. Measurement invariance between male and female groups was evaluated. Internal consistency of the six-factor model was shown and scale discrimination was shown against chronic stress. Results The EFA results showed decent model fit for the five-factor structure, however based on the CFA results, the theoretically established six-factor model fits the data significantly better. Measurement invariance between male and female groups was shown to be clearly scalar invariant. Cronbach’s alpha, omega and lambda all support internal consistency and reliability of CU-20. Conclusions The CU-20 is a valid and reliable measure of one’s state of chronic uncertainty reflecting the individuals’ experiences of macrosocial forms of uncertainty, compared to the existing ones. This scale is especially useful in the context of migration, refugees or during global crises. Further psychometric testing is required in more diverse samples and a deeper look into measurement invariance is recommended.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleFactor structure and psychometric properties of the german version chronic uncertainty scale (CU-20)en_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9971-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleBMC Psychologyde
jgu.journal.volume11de
jgu.pages.alternative173de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.nameBioMed Centralde
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.issn2050-7283de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1186/s40359-023-01206-2de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
factor_structure_and_psychome-20240123163335444.pdf1.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open