Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9866
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAfghanyar, Yama-
dc.contributor.authorMöller, Jens Hendrik-
dc.contributor.authorWunderlich, Felix-
dc.contributor.authorDargel, Jens-
dc.contributor.authorRehbein, Philipp-
dc.contributor.authorGercek, Erol-
dc.contributor.authorDrees, Philipp-
dc.contributor.authorKutzner, Karl Philipp-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T09:58:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-09T09:58:20Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9884-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Bone preservation and long-term survival are the main challenges in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). A good bone stock is especially important for adequate anchorage of the cup in revision cases. However, the optimal acetabular cup design for preserving good bone stock is still unclear. We aimed to compare clinical outcome, radiological alterations, migration, and wear at mid-term for two different cup types. Materials and methods This retrospective matched-pair study was performed using the data for 98 THA cases treated with a monoblock cup composed of vitamin E-blended highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE; monoblock group) or a modular cup composed of a highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) without an antioxidant (modular group). Clinical results were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The obtained radiographs were analyzed for radiological alterations, migration, and wear using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA) software. Results The mean follow-up duration was 73.2 ± 19.2 months (range: 32–108 months) and 60.5 ± 12.2 months (range: 20–84 months) in the monoblock and modular groups, respectively. HHS improved to 95.7 points in the monoblock group and 97.6 points in the modular group, without significant differences (p = 0.425). EBRA measurements were obtained in all cases. Acetabular bone alterations were not detected on radiological assessments. Mean cup migration was 1.67 ± 0.92 mm (range: 0.46–3.94 mm) and 1.24 ± 0.87 mm (range: 0.22–3.62 mm) in the monoblock and modular groups. The mean wear rate was 0.21 ± 0.18 mm (range: 0.00–0.70 mm) and 0.20 ± 0.13 mm (range: 0.00–0.50 mm) in the monoblock and modular groups. Both migration and wear pattern showed no significant differences (p = 0.741 and 0.243). None of the cases required revision surgery, yielding an implant survival rate of 100% in both groups. Conclusion The isoelastic press-fit monoblock VEPE cup and modular metal-back HXLPE cup showed equivalent mid-term wear and cup migration. Long-term studies are required to determine the effects of modularity, isoelasticity, and polyethylene stabilization with vitamin E on cup loosening and survival rates.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleAn isoelastic monoblock cup versus a modular metal-back cup : a matched-pair analysis of clinical and radiological results using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse softwareen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9866-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgeryde
jgu.journal.volume144de
jgu.pages.start493de
jgu.pages.end500de
jgu.publisher.year2024-
jgu.publisher.nameCurrent Sciencede
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin u.a.de
jgu.publisher.issn1434-3916de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s00402-023-05058-8de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-H

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
an_isoelastic_monoblock_cup_v-20240109105253509.pdf1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open