Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9820
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Lukas-
dc.contributor.authorTibyampansha, Dativa-
dc.contributor.authorMildenberger, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorPanholzer, Torsten-
dc.contributor.authorJungmann, Florian-
dc.contributor.authorHalfmann, Moritz C.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T09:51:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-19T09:51:59Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9838-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Kidney volume is important in the management of renal diseases. Unfortunately, the currently available, semi-automated kidney volume determination is time-consuming and prone to errors. Recent advances in its automation are promising but mostly require contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans. This study aimed at establishing an automated estimation of kidney volume in non-contrast, low-dose CT scans of patients with suspected urolithiasis. Methods The kidney segmentation process was automated with 2D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models trained on manually segmented 2D transverse images extracted from low-dose, unenhanced CT scans of 210 patients. The models’ segmentation accuracy was assessed using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), for the overlap with manually-generated masks on a set of images not used in the training. Next, the models were applied to 22 previously unseen cases to segment kidney regions. The volume of each kidney was calculated from the product of voxel number and their volume in each segmented mask. Kidney volume results were then validated against results semi-automatically obtained by radiologists. Results The CNN-enabled kidney volume estimation took a mean of 32 s for both kidneys in a CT scan with an average of 1026 slices. The DSC was 0.91 and 0.86 and for left and right kidneys, respectively. Inter-rater variability had consistencies of ICC = 0.89 (right), 0.92 (left), and absolute agreements of ICC = 0.89 (right), 0.93 (left) between the CNN-enabled and semi-automated volume estimations. Conclusion In our work, we demonstrated that CNN-enabled kidney volume estimation is feasible and highly reproducible in low-dose, non-enhanced CT scans. Automatic segmentation can thereby quantitatively enhance radiological reports.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleConvolutional neural network-based kidney volume estimation from low-dose unenhanced computed tomography scansen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9820-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleBMC medical imagingde
jgu.journal.volume23de
jgu.pages.alternative187de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.nameBioMed Centralde
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.issn1471-2342de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1186/s12880-023-01142-yde
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
convolutional_neural_networkb-20231213133841741.pdf4.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open