Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9791
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaack, Maximilian-
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Nikita D.-
dc.contributor.authorFrey, Lisa-
dc.contributor.authorSparwasser, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorDotzauer, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorDuwe, Gregor-
dc.contributor.authorHaferkamp, Axel-
dc.contributor.authorBorgmann, Hendrik-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T09:41:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-19T09:41:22Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9809-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Due to a lack of time and staff, informed consent (IC) in clinical practice often lacks clarity, comprehensibility and scope of information. Digital media offer great potential to enhance IC. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of multimedia-supported compared to traditional paper-based IC. Methods In the randomized, controlled, three-arm DICon (Digital Informed Consent for urological surgery) study 70 patients with an indication for prostate biopsy were randomized 1:1:1 to receive traditional paper-based IC vs. multimedia-supported information before IC vs. multimedia-supported information during IC. Patient satisfaction, anxiety and information gain were measured by validated questionnaires 2 weeks and directly before the procedure and time efficiency was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s test (one-way ANOVA) and two-way ANOVA (with bonferroni post-test). Results Multimedia information prior to the consultation saved 32.9% time compared to paper-based (5.3 min. vs. 9.5 min; p < 0.05) and 60.4% time compared to shared multimedia information (5.3 min. vs. 13.9 min.; p < 0.001), with no difference in satisfaction (62.6 vs. 62.7 vs. 68.6 of max. 80; p = 0.07), anxiety (8 vs. 8.1 vs. 7 of max. 16; p = 0.35), or information gain (6.5 vs. 5.7 vs. 6.7 of max. 10; p = 0.23). Results on satisfaction (56.6 vs. 62.6 vs. 66; p = 0.06), anxiety (7.2 vs. 7.2 vs. 6.8; p = 0.84), and information gain (7 vs. 6.4 vs. 5.9; p = 0.43) remained stable over time. Conclusions Multimedia-supported IC prior to consultation provided improved time efficiency (33% gain) compared to traditional paper-based IC, with comparable satisfaction, anxiety and information gain. Multimedia-supported information materials should therefore be used more frequently in patient education.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleDigital informed consent for urological surgery : randomized controlled study comparing multimedia-supported vs. traditional paper-based informed consent concerning satisfaction, anxiety, information gain and time efficiencyen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9791-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleProstate cancer and prostatic diseasesde
jgu.journal.volumeVersion of Record (VoR)de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.nameStockton Pressde
jgu.publisher.placeBasingstokede
jgu.publisher.issn1476-5608de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1038/s41391-023-00737-4de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-H

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
digital_informed_consent_for_-20231211183928143.pdf954.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open