Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9729
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHorst, Fabian-
dc.contributor.authorHoitz, Fabian-
dc.contributor.authorSlijepcevic, Djordje-
dc.contributor.authorSchons, Nicolas-
dc.contributor.authorBeckmann, Hendrik-
dc.contributor.authorNigg, Benno M.-
dc.contributor.authorSchöllhorn, Wolfgang I.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-01T08:49:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-01T08:49:52Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9747-
dc.description.abstractPlacing a stronger focus on subject-specific responses to footwear may lead to a better functional understanding of footwear’s effect on running and its influence on comfort perception, performance, and pathogenesis of injuries. We investigated subject-specific responses to different footwear conditions within ground reaction force (GRF) data during running using a machine learning-based approach. We conducted our investigation in three steps, guided by the following hypotheses: (I) For each subject x footwear combination, unique GRF patterns can be identified. (II) For each subject, unique GRF characteristics can be identified across footwear conditions. (III) For each footwear condition, unique GRF characteristics can be identified across subjects. Thirty male subjects ran ten times at their preferred (self-selected) speed on a level and approximately 15 m long runway in four footwear conditions (barefoot and three standardised running shoes). We recorded three-dimensional GRFs for one right-foot stance phase per running trial and classified the GRFs using support vector machines. The highest median prediction accuracy of 96.2% was found for the subject x footwear classification (hypothesis I). Across footwear conditions, subjects could be discriminated with a median prediction accuracy of 80.0%. Across subjects, footwear conditions could be discriminated with a median prediction accuracy of 87.8%. Our results suggest that, during running, responses to footwear are unique to each subject and footwear design. As a result, considering subject-specific responses can contribute to a more differentiated functional understanding of footwear effects. Incorporating holistic analyses of biomechanical data is auspicious for the evaluation of (subject-specific) footwear effects, as unique interactions between subjects and footwear manifest in versatile ways. The applied machine learning methods have demonstrated their great potential to fathom subject-specific responses when evaluating and recommending footwear.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc796 Sportde_DE
dc.subject.ddc796 Athletic and outdoor sports and gamesen_GB
dc.titleIdentification of subject-specific responses to footwear during runningen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9729-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleScientific reportsde
jgu.journal.volume13de
jgu.pages.alternative11284de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.nameSpringer Naturede
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.issn2045-2322de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode796de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1038/s41598-023-38090-0de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgGeistes- und Sozialwissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
identification_of_subjectspec-20231201094604035.pdf2.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open