Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9528
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Yaroslav-
dc.contributor.authorSandner, Katharina-
dc.contributor.authorVieth, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorGroppa, Sergiu-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T09:22:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-12T09:22:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9546-
dc.description.abstractObjective Due to the high mortality of patients with refractory status epilepticus (SE), new antiseizure medications (ASMs) are needed to improve long-term outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), a new sodium channel blocker, based on the data from a large epilepsy register. Methods Data on the efficacy and safety of ESL for the treatment of refractory SE were gathered from the Mainz Epilepsy Registry (MAINZ-EPIREG). Logistic regression was applied to identify predictors of status interruption. Results In total, 64 patients with remote symptomatic refractory SE were treated with ESL. No cases of idiopathic generalized epilepsy were included. The average age was 61.4 ± 11.0 years. The median number of administered ASMs before the start of ESL was three. On average, 2 days had elapsed since the onset of SE before the administration of ESL. The initial dose of 800 mg/day was increased up to a maximum daily dose of 1600 mg in case of nonresponse. In 29 of 64 patients (45.3%), the SE could be interrupted within 48 h of ESL therapy. In patients with poststroke epilepsy, the control of SE was achieved in 62% of patients (15/23). The earlier initiation of ESL therapy was an independent predictor of control of SE. Hyponatraemia occurred in five patients (7.8%). Other side effects were not observed. Significance Based on these data, ESL may be used as an adjunct therapy for the treatment of refractory SE. The best response was found in patients with poststroke epilepsy. In addition, early initiation of ESL therapy appears to result in better control of SE. Besides a few cases of hyponatraemia, no other adverse events were detected.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY-NC*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleEslicarbazepine acetate for the treatment of status epilepticusen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9528-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleEpileptic disordersde
jgu.journal.volume25de
jgu.journal.issue2de
jgu.pages.start142de
jgu.pages.end149de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.nameWiley-Blackwellde
jgu.publisher.placeOxford u.ade
jgu.publisher.issn1950-6945de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1002/epd2.20004de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-H

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
eslicarbazepine_acetate_for_t-20230901154532193.pdf3.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open