Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9380
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeimer, Johannes Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorRink, Maximilian-
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Lukas-
dc.contributor.authorDirks, Klaus-
dc.contributor.authorIlle, Carlotta-
dc.contributor.authorBozzato, Alessandro-
dc.contributor.authorSproll, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorWeimer, Andreas Michael-
dc.contributor.authorNeubert, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorBuggenhagen, Holger-
dc.contributor.authorErnst, Benjamin Philipp-
dc.contributor.authorSymeou, Luisa-
dc.contributor.authorLorenz, Liv Annebritt-
dc.contributor.authorHollinderbäumer, Anke-
dc.contributor.authorKünzel, Julian-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-17T07:47:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-17T07:47:17Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9398-
dc.description.abstractIn Germany, progress assessments in head and neck ultrasonography training have been carried out mainly theoretically and lack standardisation. Thus, quality assurance and comparisons between certified courses from various course providers are difficult. This study aimed to develop and integrate a direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) in head and neck ultrasound education and explore the perceptions of both participants and examiners. Five DOPS tests oriented towards assessing basic skills were developed for certified head and neck ultrasound courses on national standards. DOPS tests were completed by 76 participants from basic and advanced ultrasound courses (n = 168 documented DOPS tests) and evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale. Ten examiners performed and evaluated the DOPS after detailed training. The variables of “general aspects” (6.0 Scale Points (SP) vs. 5.9 SP; p = 0.71), “test atmosphere” (6.3 SP vs. 6.4 SP; p = 0.92), and “test task setting” (6.2 SP vs. 5.9 SP; p = 0.12) were positively evaluated by all participants and examiners. There were no significant differences between a basic and advanced course in relation to the overall results of DOPS tests (p = 0.81). Regardless of the courses, there were significant differences in the total number of points achieved between individual DOPS tests. DOPS tests are accepted by participants and examiners as an assessment tool in head and neck ultrasound education. In view of the trend toward “competence-based” teaching, this type of test format should be applied and validated in the future.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 491381577de
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleDevelopment and integration of DOPS as formative tests in head and neck ultrasound education : proof of concept study for exploration of perceptionsen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9380-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleDiagnosticsde
jgu.journal.volume13de
jgu.journal.issue4de
jgu.pages.alternative661de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.nameMDPIde
jgu.publisher.placeBaselde
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040661de
jgu.publisher.issn2075-4418de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.3390/diagnostics13040661de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgNaturwissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
development_and_integration_o-20230814132906640.pdf1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open