Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8903
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErbe, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorTemming, Teresa-
dc.contributor.authorOhlendorf, Daniela-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidtmann, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorMundethu, Ambili-
dc.contributor.authorFerrari-Peron, Priscila-
dc.contributor.authorWehrbein, Heinrich-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-20T08:52:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-20T08:52:47Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8919-
dc.description.abstractTo compare four plaque indices used in orthodontics. An objective, quantitative plaque index and three subjective conventional plaque indices were analyzed. The study included n = 50 photographs of n = 50 subjects with a multibracket appliance (MB) in the maxilla and mandible. Photographs were taken using Digital Plaque Imaging Analysis (DPIA) and the Percentage Plaque Index (PPI) was calculated. The conventional plaque indices, a modified version of the Turesky-modification of the Quigley & Hein Index (TQH index), Attin index, and modified bonded bracket index (mBB index) were collected from n = 14 evaluators using the DPIA photographs. The evaluators had different levels of orthodontic experience: n = 4 evaluators had little orthodontic experience, n = 5 evaluators had moderate orthodontic experience, and n = 5 evaluators had a lot of orthodontic experience. Plaque accumulation was assessed differently with the plaque indices. Thus, the plaque indices are not interchangeable. We recommend DPIA as an objective, quantitative and sensitive method for plaque determination in scientific studies. The simple statistical evaluation offers a great advantage over conventional plaque indices.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 491381577de
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleComparison of different plaque indices with regard to sensitivity and specificity for the quantification of plaque during orthodontic therapyen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8903-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleScientific reportsde
jgu.journal.volume12de
jgu.pages.alternative20947de
jgu.publisher.year2022-
jgu.publisher.nameMacmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Naturede
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24817-yde
jgu.publisher.issn2045-2322de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1038/s41598-022-24817-yde
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
comparison_of_different_plaqu-20230307140914730.pdf1.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open