Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10188
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorImhoff, Roland-
dc.contributor.authorBarker, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T07:11:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-13T07:11:14Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/10206-
dc.description.abstractMuch like other social and nonsocial evaluations, estimates of numerical quantities are susceptible to comparative influences. However, numerical representations can take either a nonsymbolic (e.g., a grouping of dots) or a symbolic numerical form (e.g., Hindu–Arabic numerals), which each produce comparative biases in opposite directions. The current work takes a fine-grained curve fitting approach across a wide range of values to the investigation of their potential nonlinear influence in the context of a numerical estimation task. A series of 3 experiments (N = 1,613) showed how nonsymbolic standards produce linear contrastive patterns (Study 1), whereas symbolic numerical anchors show a cubic assimilative effect with a leveling off in strength for more extreme standards (Study 2). Sequential contrast from the previous patterns and assimilation to the previous response were found to be present and additive in the presence of both representations but were larger in absence of the symbolic numerical anchors (Study 3).en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleConnecting the dots : Nonlinear patterns in the presence of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical standardsen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10188-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleJudgment and decision makingde
jgu.journal.volume19de
jgu.pages.alternativee34de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.nameCambridge University Pressde
jgu.publisher.placeCambridgede
jgu.publisher.issn1930-2975de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode150de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1017/jdm.2023.31de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgGeistes- und Sozialwissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-H

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
connecting_the_dots___nonline-20240313080914283.pdf1.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open