Gutenberg Open Science: How does dental implant macrogeometry afect primary implant stability? : A narrative review

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10013

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Heimes, Diana	-
dc.contributor.author	Becker, Philipp	-
dc.contributor.author	Pabst, Andreas	-
dc.contributor.author	Smeets, Ralf	-
dc.contributor.author	Kraus, Annika	-
dc.contributor.author	Hartmann, Amely	-
dc.contributor.author	Sagheb, Keyvan	-
dc.contributor.author	Kämmerer, Peer W.	-
dc.date.accessioned	2024-02-13T08:36:44Z	-
dc.date.available	2024-02-13T08:36:44Z	-
dc.date.issued	2023	-
dc.identifier.uri	https://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/10031	-
dc.description.abstract	Purpose The macrogeometry of a dental implant plays a decisive role in its primary stability. A larger diameter, a conical shape, and a roughened surface increase the contact area of the implant with the surrounding bone and thus improve primary stability. This is considered the basis for successful implant osseointegration that diferent factors, such as implant design, can infuence. This narrative review aims to critically review macro-geometric features afect ing the primary stability of dental implants. Methods For this review, a comprehensive literature search and review of relevant studies was conducted based on formulating a research question, searching the literature using keywords and electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to search for relevant studies. These studies were screened and selected, the study quality was assessed, data were extracted, the results were summarized, and conclusions were drawn. Results The macrogeometry of a dental implant includes its surface characteristics, size, and shape, all of which play a critical role in its primary stability. At the time of placement, the initial stability of an implant is determined by its contact area with the surrounding bone. Larger diameter and a conical shape of an implant result in a larger contact area and better primary stability. But the linear relationship between implant length and primary stability ends at 12 mm. Conclusions Several factors must be considered when choosing the ideal implant geometry, including local factors such as the condition of the bone and soft tissues at the implant site and systemic and patient-specifc factors such as osteoporosis, diabetes, or autoimmune diseases. These factors can afect the success of the implant procedure and the long-term stability of an implant. By considering these factors, the surgeon can ensure the greatest possible therapeutic success and minimize the risk of implant failure.	en_GB
dc.language.iso	eng	de
dc.rights	CC BY	*
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	*
dc.subject.ddc	610 Medizin	de_DE
dc.subject.ddc	610 Medical sciences	en_GB
dc.title	How does dental implant macrogeometry afect primary implant stability? : A narrative review	en_GB
dc.type	Zeitschriftenaufsatz	de
dc.identifier.doi	http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10013	-
jgu.type.contenttype	Scientific article	de
jgu.type.dinitype	article	en_GB
jgu.type.version	Published version	de
jgu.type.resource	Text	de
jgu.organisation.department	FB 04 Medizin	de
jgu.organisation.number	2700	-
jgu.organisation.name	Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz	-
jgu.rights.accessrights	openAccess	-
jgu.journal.title	International journal of implant dentistry	de
jgu.journal.volume	9	de
jgu.pages.alternative	20	de
jgu.publisher.year	2023	-
jgu.publisher.name	Springer	de
jgu.publisher.place	Berlin	de
jgu.publisher.issn	2198-4034	de
jgu.organisation.place	Mainz	-
jgu.subject.ddccode	610	de
jgu.publisher.doi	10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z	de
jgu.organisation.ror	https://ror.org/023b0x485	-
Appears in collections:	DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:

	File	Description	Size	Format
	how_does_dental_implant_macro-20240201165016226.pdf		2.86 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Show simple item record