Dating of literary ostraca with the Hieratische Paläographie der nicht-literarischen Ostraka der 19. und 20. Dynastie by Stefan Wimmer : an experiment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date issued

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Reuse License

Description of rights: InC-1.0
Item type:Item, BuchbeitragAccess status: Open Access ,

Abstract

For around one hundred years the Hieratische Paläographie by Georg Möller was the only diachronic and diatopic chrestomathy. It was used for all kind of purposes, from identifying signs to approximately dating texts – not just literary ones, for which the chrestomathy was principally produced, but also administrative texts. With the publication of Wimmer’s Hieratische Paläographie in 1995, there now existed a chrestomathy for administrative texts from Deir el-Medine, covering a period of around 250 years. As an experiment, Wimmer’s palaeography was tested as a means of dating literary texts, which were exemplified by a pre-existing small group of signed and, therefore, quite well-dated texts. On the one hand it could be shown that this works quite well, whilst on the other it demonstrated that earlier identified signs relevant for dating, such as (D51 + D40) and (Aa1), are quite reliable tools. Local idiosyncrasies could be detected, as could exceptions to the changes observed in the use of signs over time owing to the human factors, which always have an impact in studies into handwriting styles.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Published in

Ägyptologische „Binsen“-Weisheiten IV, Gülden, Svenja A., Konrad, Tobias, Verhoeven, Ursula, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, 2022

Relationships

Cites

Compiles

Continues

Describes

Documents

Has the metadata

Has the part

Has the translation

Has the version

Is cited by

Is compiled by

Is continued by

Is derived from

Is described by

Is documented by

Is identical to

Is metadata for

Is a new version of

Is an original form of

Is a previous version of

Is published in

Is referenced by

Is required by

Is reviewed by

Is a source of

Is supplemented by

Is a supplement to

Is a translation of

Is a variant form of

Is a version of

References

Requires

Reviews

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By