Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8641
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEpp, Katharina-
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, Sophie-
dc.contributor.authorWittenmeier, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorKriege, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorDette, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidtmann, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorPirlich, Nina-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T11:29:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-25T11:29:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8657-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Airway management in children is challenging due to anatomical and physiological differences. This randomized trial investigates whether anaesthesia residents can intubate the paediatric trachea more quickly and with a higher success rate using the King Vision™ Paediatric aBlade™ video laryngoscope (KVL) compared to conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methods: Eleven anaesthesia residents (mean age: 31 years, mean training status 47 months) were each asked to perform intubations with the KVL and DL in paediatric patients. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes were the time to best view (TTBV), time to placement of the tracheal tube (TTP), time to ventilation (TTV), and participant-reported ease of use on a Likert scale. Results: 105 intubations with the KVL and 106 DL were performed by the residents. The success rate on the first attempt with the KVL was 81%, and the success rate on the first attempt within a given time limit of 30 s was 45%, which was lower than with DL (93% and 77% with time limit, p < 0.01). The median TTBV [IQR] on the first attempt with KVL was 7 [5–10] s, the median TTP was 28 [19–44] s, and the median TTV was 51 [39–66] s. DL-mediated intubation was significantly faster (TTP: 17 [13–23] s; p < 0.0001 and TTV: 34 [28–44] s; p < 0.001). Application of the KVL was rated as difficult or very difficult by 60% of the residents (DL: 5%). Conclusion: In contrast to promising data on the paediatric training manikin, residents took longer to intubate the airway in children with the KVL and were less successful compared to the DL. Therefore, the KVL should not be recommended for learning paediatric intubation by residents.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 491381577de
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleVideo laryngoscopy using King Vision™ aBlade™ and direct laryngoscopy in paediatric airway management : a randomized controlled study about device learning by anaesthesia residentsen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8641-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleJournal of Clinical Medicinede
jgu.journal.volume11de
jgu.journal.issue19de
jgu.pages.alternative5676de
jgu.publisher.year2022-
jgu.publisher.nameMDPIde
jgu.publisher.placeBaselde
jgu.publisher.issn2077-0383de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.3390/jcm11195676de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
video_laryngoscopy_using_king-20230124120555160.pdf403.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open