Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7514
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJasper, Kristine-
dc.contributor.authorWeise, Cornelia-
dc.contributor.authorConrad, Isabell-
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Gerhard-
dc.contributor.authorHiller, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorKleinstäuber, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T10:11:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-04T10:11:47Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7528-
dc.description.abstractObjective This study (ID: NCT01205906) compared the impact of the working alliance between the therapist and the client on treatment outcome in a group and an Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (GCBT vs. ICBT) for chronic tinnitus. Methods The Working Alliance Inventory — Short Revised (WAI-SR, scale range: 1–5) was administered to 26 GCBT and 38 ICBT participants after treatment weeks 2, 5, and 9, and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) before and after the treatment. Results High alliance ratings were found in both ICBT (WAI-SR total scores at week 9: M = 3.59, SD = 0.72) and GCBT (WAI-SR total scores at week 9: M = 4.20, SD = 0.49), but significantly higher ratings occurred in GCBT on most WAI-SR scales (ps < .01). Significant time × group interactions for most WAI-SR scales indicated differences in alliance growth patterns between the treatments (ps < .001). Residual gain scores for the therapy outcome measure ‘tinnitus distress’ were significantly correlated with the agreement on treatment tasks between therapist and client in ICBT (r = .40, p = .014) and with the affective therapeutic bond in GCBT (r = .40, p = .043) at mid-treatment (week 5). Conclusion More time was needed to build a strong alliance in ICBT although GCBT yielded generally higher alliance ratings. Moreover, different aspects of the therapeutic alliance might be important for treatment success in ICBT versus GCBT.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizinde
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/*
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleThe working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing Internet-based self-help and face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for chronic tinnitusen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7514-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleInternet interventionsde
jgu.journal.volume1de
jgu.journal.issue2de
jgu.pages.start49de
jgu.pages.end57de
jgu.publisher.year2014-
jgu.publisher.nameElsevierde
jgu.publisher.placeAmsterdam u.a.de
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2014.04.002de
jgu.publisher.issn2214-7829de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode150de
opus.date.modified2018-08-08T07:54:52Z-
opus.subject.dfgcode00-000-
opus.organisation.stringFB 02: Sozialwissenschaften, Medien und Sport: Psychologisches Institutde_DE
opus.identifier.opusid26770-
opus.institute.number0204-
opus.metadataonlyfalse-
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_EN
opus.affiliatedHiller, Wolfgang-
jgu.publisher.doi10.1016/j.invent.2014.04.002de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017)

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
the_working_alliance_in_a_ran-20220714112322843.pdf422.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open