Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7007
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatnaik, Sarita Rani-
dc.contributor.authorFarag, Aalaa-
dc.contributor.authorBrücker, Lena-
dc.contributor.authorVolz, Ann-Kathrin-
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorKretschmer, Viola-
dc.contributor.authorMay-Simera, Helen Louise-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-20T09:06:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-20T09:06:46Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7021-
dc.description.abstractBackground Information Primary cilia are highly conserved multifunctional cell organelles that extend from the cell membrane. A range of genetic disorders, collectively termed ciliopathies, is attributed to primary cilia dysfunction. The archetypical ciliopathy is the Bardet–Biedl syndrome (BBS), patients of which display virtually all symptoms associated with dysfunctional cilia. The primary cilium acts as a sensory organelle transmitting intra- and extracellular signals thereby transducing various signalling pathways facilitated by the BBS proteins. Growing evidence suggests that cilia proteins also have alternative functions in ciliary independent mechanisms, which might be contributing to disease etiology. Results In an attempt to gain more insight into possible differences in organ specific roles, we examined whether relative gene expression for individual Bbs genes was constant across different tissues in mouse, in order to distinguish possible differences in organ specific roles. All tested tissues show differentially expressed Bbs transcripts with some tissues showing a more similar stoichiometric composition of transcripts than others do. However, loss of Bbs6 or Bbs8 affects expression of other Bbs transcripts in a tissue-dependent way. Conclusions and Significance Our data support the hypothesis that in some organs, BBS proteins not only function in a complex but might also have alternative functions in a ciliary independent context. This significantly alters our understanding of disease pathogenesis and development of possible treatment strategies.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc570 Biowissenschaftende_DE
dc.subject.ddc570 Life sciencesen_GB
dc.titleTissue-dependent differences in Bardet–Biedl syndrome gene expressionen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7007-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 10 Biologiede
jgu.organisation.number7970-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleBiology of the cellde
jgu.journal.volume112de
jgu.journal.issue2de
jgu.pages.start39de
jgu.pages.end52de
jgu.publisher.year2020-
jgu.publisher.nameWiley-Blackwellde
jgu.publisher.placeFrederiksbergde
jgu.publisher.issn1768-322Xde
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode570de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1111/boc.201900077de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
tissuedependent_differences_i-20220520110231092.pdf470.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open