Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5969
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrajnak, Slavomir-
dc.contributor.authorSchnatz, C.-
dc.contributor.authorAlmstedt, Katrin-
dc.contributor.authorBrenner, Walburgis-
dc.contributor.authorHaertner, F.-
dc.contributor.authorHeimes, Anne-Sophie-
dc.contributor.authorLebrecht, Antje-
dc.contributor.authorMakris, G.-M.-
dc.contributor.authorSchwab, Roxana-
dc.contributor.authorHasenburg, Annette-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Marcus-
dc.contributor.authorBattista, Marco J.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T08:46:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T08:46:39Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/5978-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE There is growing interest in low-dose metronomic chemotherapy (LDMC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this retrospective case–control analysis, we compared the efficacy of LDMC and conventional chemotherapy (CCT) in MBC. METHODS Each LDMC patient receiving oral cyclophosphamide (CTX) (50 mg daily) and methotrexate (MTX) (2.5 mg every other day) was matched with two controls who received CCT. Age, number of chemotherapy lines and metastatic sites as well as hormone receptor (HR) status were considered as matching criteria. Primary endpoint was disease control rate longer than 24 weeks (DCR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR) and subgroup analyses using the matching criteria. RESULTS 40 cases and 80 controls entered the study. 30.0% patients with LDMC and 22.5% patients with CCT showed DCR (p = 0.380). The median PFS was 12.0 weeks in both groups (p = 0.218) and the median DoR was 31.0 vs. 20.5 weeks (p = 0.383), respectively. Among younger patients, DCR was 40.0% in LDMC vs. 25.0% in the CCT group (p = 0.249). DCR was achieved in 33.3% vs. 26.2% non-heavily pretreated patients (p = 0.568) and in 36.0% vs. 18.0% patients without multiple metastases (p = 0.096), respectively. In the HR-positive group, 30.0% LDMC vs. 28.3% CCT patients showed DCR (p = 1.000). Among triple-negative patients, DCR was achieved in 30.0% LDMC and 5.0% CCT patients (p = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated a similar efficacy of LDMC compared to CCT in the treatment of MBC. Thus, LDMC may be a valuable treatment option in selected MBC patients.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleLow-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer : results of an exploratory case–control studyen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5969-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleBreast cancer research and treatmentde
jgu.journal.volume182de
jgu.pages.start389de
jgu.pages.end399de
jgu.publisher.year2020-
jgu.publisher.nameSpringer Science + Business Media B.V.de
jgu.publisher.placeDordrecht u.a.de
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05711-5de
jgu.publisher.issn1573-7217de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s10549-020-05711-5-
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
krajnak_s.-low-dose_metro-20210527011422443.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open