Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-436
Authors: | Hecht, Heiko |
Title: | Manifest illusions : a reply to Axel Kohler |
Online publication date: | 11-Nov-2016 |
Year of first publication: | 2015 |
Language: | english |
Abstract: | The notion of illusion as a discrepancy between physical stimulus and percept (here referred to as illusion d, as long as merely this "error" is meant) is unable to capture the four very different cases in which illusions can arise. The observer may or may not be aware of the discrepancy, and its magnitude may be large or small. I argue that the special case of small error paired with awareness deserves special attention. Only in this case does the observer readily see the illusion, since it becomes manifest (referred to as illusion m). Illusion m is a meaningful category even in cases where illusion d cannot be determined. Illusions m of apparent motion and illusions of intuitive physics are solicited. |
DDC: | 100 Philosophie 100 Philosophy |
Institution: | Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz |
Department: | FB 05 Philosophie und Philologie |
Place: | Mainz |
ROR: | https://ror.org/023b0x485 |
DOI: | http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-436 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hebis:77-publ-551519 |
Version: | Published version |
Publication type: | Buchbeitrag |
License: | In Copyright |
Information on rights of use: | https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Citation: | Open MIND Metzinger, Thomas |
Pages or article number: | Kap. 18(R) |
Publisher: | MIND Group |
Publisher place: | Frankfurt am Main |
Issue date: | 2015 |
Publisher URL: | http://dx.doi.org/10.15502/9783958570702 |
Publisher DOI: | 10.15502/9783958570702 |
Appears in collections: | JGU-Publikationen |