Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-2353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEkta
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-29T09:37:58Z
dc.date.available2019-10-29T10:37:58Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/2355-
dc.description.abstractThe Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is dedicated to the task of performing high energy scattering collisions. The success of the physics program at the LHC also demands high precision of theoretical predictions. We need to calculate multi-loop scattering amplitudes in perturbative quantum field theory to obtain precise theoretical predictions. Feynman integrals are the building blocks for scattering amplitudes and therefore the calculation of scattering amplitudes at higher orders in perturbation theory also requires a deep understanding of multi-loop Feynman integrals. Now is the age when we need to evaluate two-loop corrections to processes with massive particles, like the top quark and the electroweak bosons. The calculation of two-loop Feynman integrals with masses, using the available tools, often turns out to be a difficult task. The algebraic structure of the Feynman integral has proven to be a great help in computing these integrals. In practice, we use the method of differential equations to solve a particular Feynman integral. We can exploit the properties of dimensionally regulated integrals to find a basis of integrals which we call the master integrals. Solving these master integrals correspond to solving the Feynman integral. The use of a particular canonical form' makes the solution of the differential equation for the master integrals simpler and lets us immediately write them down in terms of iterated integrals at all orders in the dimensional regularization parameter. In the case of mostly massless processes, the integrals are known to evaluate to a special class of functions known as the multiple polylogarithms. This is not true starting from two loops. The simplest single scale example for this case is given by the very famous sunrise integral which is known to contain an elliptic curve and needs elliptic generalizations of multiple polylogarithms in order to write down the solution. In this work, we present two examples of Feynman integrals which depend on multiple scales. The first one is the planar double box integral with a closed top loop, which is required for the top-pair production. This integral enters the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) contribution for the process $pprightarrow t bar{t}$ and was a bottleneck for a long time. The system of differential equations for the double box integral is governed by three different elliptic curves, which originate from different sub-topologies. In order to solve the differential equation satisfied by the master integrals in this case, we use the factorization properties of the Picard--Fuchs operator associated with the elliptic' topologies to bring down the system of differential equation to the one coupled in blocks of sizes $2 times 2$ at worst, at order $epsilon^0$. We also use the linear form for the differential equation in order to solve the system as iterated integrals in the dimensional regularization parameter conveniently. The other example presented is that of the two-loop master integrals relevant to mixed QCD-EW corrections to the decay $Hrightarrow b bar{b}$ through a $Htbar{t}$ coupling. This has been done keeping full dependence on the heavy particle masses $(m_t,; m_H; text{and}; m_W)$, but neglecting the $b$-quark mass. In this case, the system of differential equations for the master integrals can be brought to the canonical form and the master integrals can be expressed entirely in terms of multiple polylogarithms.en_GB
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsInCopyrightde_DE
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc530 Physikde_DE
dc.subject.ddc530 Physicsen_GB
dc.titleTechniques for solving two-loop massive Feynman integralsen_GB
dc.typeDissertationde_DE
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:hebis:77-diss-1000031363
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-2353-
jgu.type.dinitypedoctoralThesis
jgu.type.versionOriginal worken_GB
jgu.type.resourceText
jgu.description.extent155 Seiten
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 08 Physik, Mathematik u. Informatik-
jgu.organisation.year2019
jgu.organisation.number7940-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode530
opus.date.accessioned2019-10-29T09:37:58Z
opus.date.modified2019-11-12T10:03:30Z
opus.date.available2019-10-29T10:37:58
opus.subject.dfgcode00-000
opus.organisation.stringFB 08: Physik, Mathematik und Informatik: Institut für Physikde_DE
opus.identifier.opusid100003136
opus.institute.number0801
opus.metadataonlyfalse
opus.type.contenttypeDissertationde_DE
opus.type.contenttypeDissertationen_GB
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
100003136.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open